Carbon Fiber Implant for Fixation of a Pathologic Subtrochanteric Fracture
Massachusetts General Hospital
Main Text
Table of Contents
Herein, we present a patient with a pathologic subtrochanteric femur fracture secondary to an undiagnosed primary lung adenocarcinoma. The fracture, occurring in the context of persistent atraumatic thigh and knee pain, prompted swift identification of its pathological nature in the Emergency Department. The treatment plan involved open reduction and internal fixation utilizing a carbon fiber nail, considering the immediate need for stabilization and underlying oncologic factors.
The primary focus was on achieving fracture fixation, traditionally accomplished with intramedullary devices. However, the decision to employ a carbon fiber nail was made due to the pathological nature of the fracture and the subsequent need for post surgery oncologic intervention. The unique radiolucency of carbon fiber aids in postoperative radiation planning, ensuring optimal visualization and precision in targeting bone lesions. This approach contributes to fracture reduction while minimizing interference with radiation therapy.
The surgical procedure involved intramedullary rodding with a carbon fiber nail, achieving successful fracture reduction and optimal hardware positioning. Histopathological assessment confirmed metastatic lung adenocarcinoma. Postoperatively, the patient received palliative radiation and targeted therapy, demonstrating substantial improvement at the two-month follow-up (Figure 6).
The case highlights the strategic use of carbon fiber implants in managing pathologic fractures, offering advantages in postoperative imaging, disease monitoring, and precision in radiation therapy planning. The multidisciplinary approach underscores the importance of considering implant selection nuances, especially in metastatic bone disease, to optimize outcomes.
Carbon fiber implants; pathologic fracture; metastatic bone disease.
A patient presented with a pathologic subtrochanteric femur fracture on the right side, occurring in the context of an initially undiagnosed primary lung adenocarcinoma. Her medical history included persistent atraumatic thigh and knee pain, progressively worsening, culminating in a sudden increase in pain, leg weakness, and a subsequent fall after her leg gave way on the stairs. Upon presentation to the Emergency Department, the pathological nature of the fracture was promptly identified. Subsequent to an oncologic assessment, the treatment plan involved an open reduction and internal fixation, opting for a carbon fiber nail due to the immediate need for fracture stabilization and the underlying oncologic considerations.
In this case, the primary focus was on achieving fracture fixation, a task traditionally accomplished with an intramedullary device. However, considering the pathological nature of the fracture and the subsequent need for oncologic intervention post surgery, the decision was made to utilize a carbon fiber nail. Pathologic fractures, common in metastatic conditions, often necessitate postoperative radiation to address residual cancer cells and facilitate native bone healing. The implementation of radiation treatment planning, involving CT simulation planning, is significantly aided by carbon fiber implants, enhancing visualization and precision in targeting the bone lesion. This approach aims to attain the goal of fracture reduction while minimizing the interference posed by traditional metal implants during radiation planning.
A geriatric white female was found to have a subtrochanteric pathologic fracture. Incidentally, on further work-up, the patient was found to have a primary lung carcinoma. Employing a carbon fiber nail during open reduction and internal fixation not only stabilized the fracture but also optimized precision in postoperative radiation planning.
The patient denied any head strike or loss of consciousness and exhibited no signs of delirium or confusion. Physical examination of the right lower extremity was limited due to pain. Her right leg was noticeably shortened. The examination revealed pain and limited strength in the extensor hallucis longus (EHL), flexor hallucis longus (FHL), tibialis anterior (TA), and gastrocnemius (GS). Distal pulses, including dorsalis pedis (DP) and posterior tibial (PT), were intact, and the right foot displayed warmth and adequate perfusion. Subsequent soft tissue injury evaluation disclosed disruptions in the superficial peroneal nerve (SPN), deep peroneal nerve (DPN), tibial nerve (TN), saphenous nerve, and sural nerve.
X-ray imaging of the right hip and femur at her initial presentation following the fall revealed a displaced subtrochanteric fracture with medial displacement of the distal fragment. The femoral head remained well-seated in the acetabulum, and the remainder of the femur was intact (Figure 1). Degenerative joint space narrowing with marginal osteophytes was evident. A contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest depicted a large right upper lobe mass encasing the right mainstem bronchus, resulting in complete right upper lobe atelectasis (Figure 2). The mass was suspicious for malignancy. Multiple enlarged mediastinal and bilateral hilar lymph nodes are concerning for metastatic disease. A non-enhanced CT scan of the right femur revealed non-specific intracortical lucencies of the femoral midshaft at the inferior margin of the fracture. This finding raised concerns for underlying permeative lesions and a pathological fracture (Figure 3). Although follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may have helped determine the presence of underlying osseous lesions, evaluation in the acute setting is limited by edema and hemorrhage, prompting the decision to forgo this examination.
Figure 1. AP and lateral x-rays of the right hip illustrating a displaced subtrochanteric fracture. The femoral head maintains reduction within the acetabulum, while the rest of the femur remains structurally intact.
Figure 2. A heterogeneously enhancing mass, located in the right paramediastinal region of the right upper lobe, was found during a CT chest with contrast. The presence of this finding suggests a diagnosis of primary lung cancer.
Figure 3. Lateral and AP non-contrasted CT images of the right femur show intracortical lucencies in the femoral mid-shaft, suggesting a potential pathological fracture.
Pathologic fractures, distinct from traumatic fractures, emerge as a result of an underlying condition, including but not limited to osteoporosis, cancer, infection, or metabolic disorders. This distinctive category of fractures is characterized by the influence of pathological processes that compromise the structural integrity of the bone.1 Pathological fractures can lead to significant morbidity and a decline in overall quality of life.2 The skeletal system ranks as the third most common site for metastases, following the lung and liver.3 Around 70% of all bone metastases occur due to metastatic breast and prostate cancers, with lung, kidney, and thyroid tumors being the next most common causes in terms of prevalence.4
Patients experiencing pathologic fractures may exhibit pain and swelling at the fracture site, along with difficulty ambulating, reduced range of motion, ecchymosis, local edema, and noticeable extremity shortening.5 A clinical indicator of pathologic fractures lies in their underlying cause, often presenting with minimal trauma—considerably less force than required to fracture a healthy bone.6 Although infrequent, pathologic fractures may be the presenting sign of an underlying malignancy.7 This underscores the need for meticulous investigation and diagnostic scrutiny, especially in cases where there is a history of limited or absent trauma.
A femoral pathologic fracture presents similar challenges to a traumatic femur fracture yet introduces additional postoperative considerations that impact implant selection. Similar to managing femur fractures in healthy bone, it is crucial to achieve fracture reduction and stabilization. This not only alleviates pain and provides stability for ambulation but also establishes a biomechanical environment conducive to optimal fracture healing.
Managing subtrochanteric fractures presents challenges in achieving reduction and fixation, with the reduction often requiring percutaneous or open techniques.8 Surgical fixation, a well-tolerated intervention, demonstrates comparable functional outcomes to non-pathologic fixation.9 From an oncologic perspective, treating the malignant cells in the bone is pivotal for effective bone healing. In the post fracture treatment regimen, chemotherapy and radiation therapy play crucial roles in achieving this goal. Radiation therapy, typically planned with external beam therapy, necessitates a pretreatment CT scan for accurate planning. However, the presence of metal implants can cause beam scatter, reducing imaging resolution and impacting radiation therapy plans. Carbon fiber implants, devoid of the radiographic properties of metals, can effectively fulfill the goals of fracture reduction and healing while minimally affecting adjuvant therapies essential for radiotherapy.10
The purpose of long bone fixation after a fracture is to facilitate proper healing, restore stability, and promote functional recovery. When considering treatment options for subtrochanteric femur fractures, the primary modalities of fixation include nail or plate fixation, with the current orthopedic literature favoring nail fixation.8 In the selection of implant materials, it is imperative to account for the underlying etiology of the fracture and surgeon proficiency with both techniques.
For patients with pathological fractures secondary to metastatic bone disease, carbon fiber nails may be a preferable alternative to titanium nails, owing to their radiolucency and favorable mechanical properties.11,12 Carbon fiber implants significantly decrease scatter on CT and reduce susceptibility artifact on MRI, which allows for improved visualization of bone healing, postoperative surveillance for local disease recurrence or progression, and precision in radiation planning.10,13,14
While there are several advantages to carbon fiber fixation, there are no differences in the functional outcomes and complication profiles of carbon fiber and metal fixation.11,12 Both techniques achieve the goal of fracture stabilization and maintenance of reduction with a low risk of complication and well-documented healing and biocompatibility. Consequently, the operating surgeon should carefully weigh their proficiency and comfort level with each fixation method and implant type in the decision-making process.12,15
When formulating the treatment strategy for a pathologic subtrochanteric fracture, it is imperative to take into account both short- and long-term goals. In the short term, utilizing a carbon fiber implant for fixation aims to establish bony stability following fracture reduction. Fracture reduction restores limb length, muscular tension, and normal anatomical relationships. Maintaining this reduction decreases pain by stabilizing bony fragments appropriately.16 As a load-sharing device, the implant may allow the patient to mobilize immediately, reducing the risk of venous thromboembolism, bed sores, and rapid deconditioning.17
In the intermediate postoperative period, the stability afforded by the implant plays a crucial role in promoting fracture healing, especially when combined with adjuvant therapy for cancer treatment.18 Opting for a carbon fiber implant not only simplifies postoperative radiographic disease monitoring but also enhances the precision of planning for radiation therapy. This strategic choice contributes to improved accuracy and efficacy in the overall treatment approach.19
Carbon fiber implants may be contraindicated for humeral diaphyseal bone tumors requiring large segmental resection with a short residual bone segment (5 cm) and a substantial cement spacer. Such implants may fail via tension due to bending forces at the distal portion of the intramedullary nail, where there is a modulus of elasticity mismatch between the cement spacer and the residual bone. In such scenarios, titanium intramedullary nails emerge as a preferable choice, offering a potential solution to address the challenges associated with carbon fiber implants in this specific context.20
Surgeons need to take into account their familiarity and comfort level with carbon fiber implants, considering the learning curve associated with these implants. Carbon fiber implants have been linked to longer operative and fluoroscopy times, as well as increased blood loss, particularly in orthopedic and spine oncology.12,21 Balancing clinical considerations and surgeon proficiency is essential when deciding on the suitability of carbon fiber implants in this specialized field.
The utilization of carbon fiber implants in orthopedics demands a thorough consideration of several pivotal clinical factors. Despite comparable complication and failure rates to titanium implants, carbon fiber implants lack intraoperative flexibility for bending or contouring. Surgeons must engage in meticulous preoperative planning to ensure an optimal fit.22 While the radiolucency of carbon fiber is advantageous for postoperative imaging studies, confirming the implant position intraoperatively may pose challenges. On the contrary, metallic implants, though devoid of intraoperative flexibility, often disrupt radiation planning mapping and hinder accurate dose calculation and delivery.23,24 Furthermore, in situations where the disease extends to the joint and necessitates joint replacement, carbon fiber implants may not be the most suitable option. Therefore, the decision to employ carbon fiber implants involves a nuanced assessment of their benefits and limitations within specific clinical contexts.
Intramedullary rodding of the right femur was performed for operative fixation of the lesion in addition to an open biopsy to determine the etiology of the metastatic bone disease. Per imaging studies, this appeared to be a primary lung cancer with metastasis to the bone. The patient was placed in a lateral decubitus with the assistance of a beanbag. All bony prominences were adequately padded. Placement of a subaxillary roll and offloading of the left peroneal nerve took place.
A lateral incision was made on the proximal thigh, and a subvastus approach was performed subsequently to expose the fracture site. A Cobra retractor facilitated exposure after identification of the fracture site. Permanent and frozen pathology samples were obtained using curettes. Frozen pathology confirmed metastatic lung adenocarcinoma. Aggressive debridement of the tumor lesion, both inside and outside the bone, was performed. Copious irrigation of the surgical field with peroxide solution was performed.
Utilizing fresh gloves and a new set of instruments, a subsequent incision proximal to the initial site was made to gain access to the proximal femur. The fascia of the gluteus medius was longitudinally incised to identify the tip of the greater tuberosity. A 3.2-mm guidewire marked the starting point, ensuring an excellent position in both anteroposterior (AP) and lateral views. Maintaining the femur in a neutral position was facilitated by a Shantz pin, aiding in internal rotation and adduction of the proximal femoral fragment.
The significantly flexed fragment underwent additional positioning to ensure extension. A finger reduction tool, supported by two Shantz pins in the proximal femur and the femoral shaft, was used to achieve anatomical reduction of the fracture. With the fracture reduced, the opening reamer was used to open the trajectory in the proximal femur. Advancing a ball-tipped guidewire, we maintained the reduction and confirmed the excellent position of the wire in the distal femur. A 360-mm carbon fiber nail with an 11-mm diameter was measured. We sequentially reamed up to size 12.5 mm, and smoothly inserted using a tube exchanger to remove the ball tip guidewire and insert the smooth one. The carbon fiber femoral nail was inserted over the smooth wire in the traditional fashion, with the aiming arm positioned anteriorly, externally rotating the aiming arm as the nail is advanced. The rod is tapped to its final position until the top part of the rod is covered by the proximal femur.
Manipulating the soft tissues, we utilized the incision from the biopsy to insert the triple trochar through the aiming arm. We then inserted through the femoral guidewire for the trajectory in the femoral neck for the hip screw. Under fluoroscopy, proper position was confirmed. Reaming to a length of 95 mm was achieved. The instrument for the hip screw was secured without difficulty, initially tapping the path and then inserting the screw following the marked trajectory in the femoral neck, and then securing it with the setting screw.
Maintaining a perfect AP of the right hip and knee, the distal portion of the nail was secured with two 5.0-mm titanium screws measuring 40 and 40.5 mm in length (Figure 4). Final images confirmed successful reduction of the fracture and optimal hardware positioning (Figure 5). Copious irrigation was performed, followed by layer-by-layer closure. There were no complications during the case. The case length was 121 minutes with an estimated blood loss of 250 mL.
Figure 4. Fluoroscopy imaging was used to demonstrate the different surgical steps involved in treating the femur fracture. This included showing the starting point and reduction of the fracture using Shantz pins. Additional imaging was used to show the carbon fiber nail, carbon fiber hip screw, and two titanium interlocking screws that were used to ensure the stability of the nail. Radio-opaque markers aided in visualizing these apertures, observable from both AP and lateral views. It is noteworthy that the guides for these entry holes differ from the standard circular ones typically visible in fluoroscopy for titanium nails.
Figure 5. An AP x-ray of the femur and a lateral x-ray of the knee post carbon fiber intramedullary rod fixation for a pathologic subtrochanteric fracture of the right femur show improved alignment with no signs of hardware complications. The lower leg reveals no additional suspicious lytic lesions, and there is no indication of new fractures.
An open biopsy of the right proximal femur was performed in addition to operative fixation, and a 5.5x5.5x2.5-cm specimen, consisting of dusty pink-red soft tissue fragments, was sent for histopathological assessment by a fellowship-trained bone and soft tissue pathologist. An immunostain for PD-L1 was performed on a representative tissue block and revealed >100 tumor cells available for scoring. PD-L1 showed membranous staining of strong intensity in >95% of tumor cells (tumor proportion score, or TPS, >95%).25 Immunohistochemistry showed tumor cells that were positive for TTF-1 and Napsin-A and negative for p40. Given these findings, the final pathologic diagnosis of the right proximal femur lesion is metastatic carcinoma consistent with lung primary.26–28
One month after surgery, the patient received 20 Gy of palliative radiation in five fractions to the right hip. In the setting of metastatic bone disease, radiation therapy mitigates osteoclast activation, kills tumor cells, and alleviates bone pain by producing ossification.29 Concurrently, medical oncology started the patient on Capmatinib, a targeted therapy used to treat metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. At the two-month follow-up, the patient demonstrated substantial improvement, being able to ambulate without a walker. Her knees were stable to valgus and varus stress on full extension and 30° of flexion. Hip flexion, extension, internal rotation, and external rotation were within normal limits. By six weeks after starting Capmatinib, the patient was responding well to treatment. A CT of the chest showed a decreased mass in the right upper lobe and decreased bilateral mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy. At her most recent follow-up, her functional status has shown no significant changes with no discernable hardware changes, and she continues to receive Capmatinib, undergoing frequent radiographic monitoring (Figure 7).
Figure 6. AP and lateral x-rays of the femur and a lateral x-ray of the knee, two months after fixation, show new callus formation and bony bridging, maintaining original alignment. No new fractures are present, but mild degenerative changes observed in the right hip.
Figure 7. At six months after fixation, AP and lateral femur x-rays reveal continued callus formation and copious bony bridging, maintaining the initial alignment. The fracture displays signs of incomplete healing alongside the presence of heterotopic bone formation. There are no discernible hardware complications or indications of new fractures. Furthermore, analogous degenerative changes persist in the right hip.
Metastasis plays a significant role in the morbidity and mortality associated with cancer.30 Lung cancer, the second most common carcinoma in men and women, respectively, exhibits a preference for metastasis in the brain, bones, and adrenal glands.31,32 Metastatic bone disease not only inflicts debilitating pain on patients but also imposes a substantial financial burden. The current estimate of 250,000 patients in the United States grappling with this condition translates to an annual healthcare cost of $12 billion.33,34 Advances in treatments, while improving cancer survival rates, have consequently led to a higher incidence of metastatic bone disease. Pathologic fractures arising from this condition stem from numerous lesions reaching a size that jeopardizes the structural integrity of the bone, ultimately culminating in fractures.35 To improve long-term patient survival and quality of life, it is crucial to prioritize appropriate treatment modalities in disease management strategically.36
As this patient carried no oncologic diagnosis prior to the femur fracture, it is important to highlight the key points that can help identify at risk bony lesions prior to fracture. The patient reported multiple months of pain in the hip prior to the fracture, which can often be the first clinical finding of any visceral carcinoma. Shrewd history taking and physical exam findings that reveal pain that has no explanation, especially functional pain should be investigated. The most appropriate method of evaluation is with plain radiographs of the entire bone in the extremity that is affected, to ensure that referred pain is not a masking clinical factor.
After the fracture is treated appropriately and the patient has survived the immediate postoperative phase, attention must turn to addressing the underlying disease, necessitating a multidisciplinary approach involving medical and radiation oncology. Medical oncology provides systemic treatment for both the primary cancer and its metastatic lesions. Radiation oncology serves a critical purpose in local treatment within the subacute postoperative period, aggressively targeting disseminated cancer cells to facilitate the essential bony healing process. Although case series report a lower rate of disease progression after medullary nail stabilization, the risk of hardware failure increases with patient survival.37,38 Carbon fiber implants can improve disease monitoring and bone healing when used with advanced imaging techniques.12 Studies investigating patient-reported outcomes and cost-effectiveness of carbon fiber implants versus titanium may enhance clinical adoption.
No special equipment used beyond the carbon fiber implant.
The corresponding author is a paid speaker and consultant for CarboFix Orthopaedics Ltd.
The patient referred to in this video article has given their informed consent to be filmed and is aware that information and images will be published online.
Citations
- Haase SC. Treatment of pathologic fractures. Hand Clin. 2013;29(4):579-584. doi:10.1016/j.hcl.2013.08.010.
- Coleman RE. Clinical features of metastatic bone disease and risk of skeletal morbidity. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12(20 Pt 2):6243s-6249s. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0931.
- Hage WD, Aboulafia AJ, Aboulafia DM. Incidence, location, and diagnostic evaluation of metastatic bone disease. Orthop Clin North Am. 2000;31(4):515-528, vii. doi:10.1016/s0030-5898(05)70171-1.
- Christ AB, Piple AS, Gettleman BS, et al. Prevalence of primary malignant tumours, rates of pathological fracture, and mortality in the setting of metastatic bone disease. Bone Jt Open. 2023;4(6):424-431. doi:10.1302/2633-1462.46.BJO-2023-0042.R1.
- Johnson SK, Knobf MT. Surgical interventions for cancer patients with impending or actual pathologic fractures. Orthop Nurs. 2008;27(3):160-171; quiz 172-173. doi:10.1097/01.NOR.0000320543.90115.d5.
- De Mattos CBR, Binitie O, Dormans JP. Pathological fractures in children. Bone Joint Res. 2012;1(10):272-280. doi:10.1302/2046-3758.110.2000120.
- Kim LD, Bueno FT, Yonamine ES, Próspero JD de, Pozzan G. Bone metastasis as the first symptom of tumors: role of an immunohistochemistry study in establishing primary tumor. Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2018;53(4):467-471. doi:10.1016/j.rboe.2018.05.015.
- Yoon RS, Donegan DJ, Liporace FA. Reducing subtrochanteric femur fractures: tips and tricks, do’s and don’ts. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29 Suppl 4:S28-33. doi:10.1097/BOT.0000000000000287.
- Weiss RJ, Ekström W, Hansen BH, et al. Pathological subtrochanteric fractures in 194 patients: a comparison of outcome after surgical treatment of pathological and non-pathological fractures. J Surg Oncol. 2013;107(5):498-504. doi:10.1002/jso.23277.
- Depauw N, Pursley J, Lozano-Calderon SA, Patel CG. Evaluation of carbon fiber and titanium surgical implants for proton and photon therapy. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2023;13(3):256-262. doi:10.1016/j.prro.2023.01.009.
- Lozano-Calderon SA, Rijs Z, Groot OQ, et al. Outcomes of long bones treated with carbon-fiber nails for oncologic indications: international multi-institutional study. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2024;32(3):e134-e145. doi:10.5435/JAAOS-D-22-01159.
- Yeung CM, Bhashyam AR, Groot OQ, et al. Comparison of carbon fibre and titanium intramedullary nails in orthopaedic oncology. Bone Jt Open. 2022;3(8):648-655. doi:10.1302/2633-1462.38.BJO-2022-0092.R1.
- Ernstberger T, Heidrich G, Bruening T, Krefft S, Buchhorn G, Klinger HM. The interobserver-validated relevance of intervertebral spacer materials in MRI artifacting. Eur Spine J. 2007;16(2):179-185. doi:10.1007/s00586-006-0064-5.
- Alvarez-Breckenridge C, de Almeida R, Haider A, et al. Carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone spinal implants for treatment of spinal tumors: perceived advantages and limitations. Neurospine. 2023;20(1):317-326. doi:10.14245/ns.2244920.460.
- Clunk MJ, Gonzalez MR, Denwood HM, et al. A PEEK into carbon fiber: a practical guide for high performance composite polymeric implants for orthopaedic oncology. J Orthop. 2023;45:13-18. doi:10.1016/j.jor.2023.09.011.
- Manglani HH, Marco RA, Picciolo A, Healey JH. Orthopedic emergencies in cancer patients. Semin Oncol. 2000;27(3):299-310.
- Booth K, Rivet J, Flici R, et al. Progressive mobility protocol reduces venous thromboembolism rate in trauma intensive care patients: a quality improvement project. J Trauma Nurs. 2016;23(5):284-289. doi:10.1097/JTN.0000000000000234.
- Colyer RA. Surgical stabilization of pathological neoplastic fractures. Curr Probl Cancer. 1986;10(3):117-168. doi:10.1016/s0147-0272(86)80005-8.
- Xin-ye N, Xiao-bin T, Chang-ran G, Da C. The prospect of carbon fiber implants in radiotherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2012;13(4):3821. doi:10.1120/jacmp.v13i4.3821.
- Bhashyam AR, Yeung C, Sodhi A, et al. Titanium vs. carbon fiber-reinforced intramedullary nailing for humeral bone tumors. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023;32(11):2286-2295. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2023.04.023.
- Cofano F, Di Perna G, Monticelli M, et al. Carbon fiber reinforced vs titanium implants for fixation in spinal metastases: a comparative clinical study about safety and effectiveness of the new “carbon-strategy”. J Clin Neurosci. 2020;75:106-111. doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2020.03.013.
- Yeung CM, Bhashyam AR, Patel SS, Ortiz-Cruz E, Lozano-Calderón SA. Carbon fiber implants in orthopaedic oncology. J Clin Med. 2022;11(17). doi:10.3390/jcm11174959.
- Tedesco G, Gasbarrini A, Bandiera S, Ghermandi R, Boriani S. Composite PEEK/carbon fiber implants can increase the effectiveness of radiotherapy in the management of spine tumors. J Spine Surg. 2017;3(3):323-329. doi:10.21037/jss.2017.06.20.
- Nevelsky A, Borzov E, Daniel S, Bar-Deroma R. Perturbation effects of the carbon fiber-PEEK screws on radiotherapy dose distribution. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017;18(2):62-68. doi:10.1002/acm2.12046.
- Keppens C, Dequeker EM, Pauwels P, Ryska A, ’t Hart N, von der Thüsen JH. PD-L1 immunohistochemistry in non-small-cell lung cancer: unraveling differences in staining concordance and interpretation. Virchows Arch. 2021;478(5):827-839. doi:10.1007/s00428-020-02976-5.
- Yatabe Y, Mitsudomi T, Takahashi T. TTF-1 expression in pulmonary adenocarcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol. 2002;26(6):767-773. doi:10.1097/00000478-200206000-00010.
- Zhang P, Han YP, Huang L, Li Q, Ma DL. Value of napsin A and thyroid transcription factor-1 in the identification of primary lung adenocarcinoma. Oncol Lett. 2010;1(5):899-903. doi:10.3892/ol_00000160.
- Affandi KA, Tizen NMS, Mustangin M, Zin RRMRM. p40 immunohistochemistry is an excellent marker in primary lung squamous cell carcinoma. J Pathol Transl Med. 2018;52(5):283-289. doi:10.4132/jptm.2018.08.14.
- De Felice F, Piccioli A, Musio D, Tombolini V. The role of radiation therapy in bone metastases management. Oncotarget. 2017;8(15):25691-25699. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.14823.
- Nooh A, Goulding K, Isler MH, et al. Early improvement in pain and functional outcome but not quality of life after surgery for metastatic long bone disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018;476(3):535-545. doi:10.1007/s11999.0000000000000065.
- Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023;73(1):17-48. doi:10.3322/caac.21763.
- Popper HH. Progression and metastasis of lung cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2016;35(1):75-91. doi:10.1007/s10555-016-9618-0.
- Guy GP, Ekwueme DU, Yabroff KR, et al. Economic burden of cancer survivorship among adults in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(30):3749-3757. doi:10.1200/JCO.2013.49.1241.
- Li S, Peng Y, Weinhandl ED, et al. Estimated number of prevalent cases of metastatic bone disease in the US adult population. Clin Epidemiol. 2012;4:87-93. doi:10.2147/CLEP.S28339.
- Blank AT, Lerman DM, Patel NM, Rapp TB. Is prophylactic intervention more cost-effective than the treatment of pathologic fractures in metastatic bone disease? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474(7):1563-1570. doi:10.1007/s11999-016-4739-x.
- Gutowski CJ, Zmistowski B, Fabbri N, Boland PJ, Healey JH. Should the use of biologic agents in patients with renal and lung cancer affect our surgical management of femoral metastases? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019;477(4):707-714. doi:10.1097/CORR.0000000000000434.
- Miller BJ, Soni EEC, Gibbs CP, Scarborough MT. Intramedullary nails for long bone metastases: why do they fail? Orthopedics. 2011;34(4). doi:10.3928/01477447-20110228-12.
- Arpornsuksant P, Morris CD, Forsberg JA, Levin AS. What factors are associated with local metastatic lesion progression after intramedullary nail stabilization? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022;480(5):932-945. doi:10.1097/CORR.0000000000002104.
Cite this article
Rizk PA, Werenski JO, Lozano-Calderon SA. Carbon fiber implant for fixation of a pathologic subtrochanteric fracture. J Med Insight. 2024;2024(443). doi:10.24296/jomi/443.
Procedure Outline
Table of Contents
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Open Bone Lesion Biopsy of the Right Proximal Femur Through Lateral Subvastus Approach
- 3. Second Incision for Insertion of Nail into the Proximal Femur
- 4. Provisional Reduction with Schanz Pins Under Fluoroscopy
- 5. Placement of Starting Wire in Proximal Fragment
- 6. Opening Reamer over Starting Wire
- 7. Reduction with Finger Reduction Tool
- 8. Ball-Tip Guidewire Insertion
- 9. Measurement for the Length of the Nail
- 10. Sequential Reaming over Ball-Tip Guidewire
- 11. Exchanging the Ball-Tip Guidewire for a Smooth Wire that Fits Through the Carbon Fiber Implant
- 12. Carbon Fiber Implant Placement over Smooth Wire
- 13. Guidewire Insertion for the Femoral Neck Screw Trajectory Using the Aiming Arm and the Triple Trocar
- 14. Measurement for the Length of the Femoral Neck Screw
- 15. Triple Reamer and Femoral Neck Screw over Guidewire
- 16. Setting Screw Proximally on the Nail
- 17. Confirming Position on AP and Lateral Views of the Hip and Knee
- 18. Blocking Screws for Distal Nail
- 19. Final Confirmation of Positioning on AP and Lateral Views
- 20. Copious Irrigation
- 21. Hemostasis and Closure
- 22. Post-op Remarks
- Pre-op CT of the Right Pelvis and Femur
- Position the C-arm to Match the Position of the Leg to Avoid Disturbing the Reduction
- Gain Access to Distal Femur
- Use Two Drills Left in Place to Help Guide Second Trajectory
- Measure for the Length of the First Screw
- Place First Screw
- Measure for the Length of the Second Screw
- Place Second Screw
Transcription
CHAPTER 1
My name is Santiago Lozano.I'm an orthopedic oncologistat the Massachusetts General Hospitalin Boston, Massachusetts.Thank you for taking the time to review the next videofor the surgical technique using carbon fiber implantsfor fixation of a pathologic subtrochanteric fracture.The following video will describe the surgical techniquefor the trochanteric entry femoral nailmade of carbon fiber as mentioned.The case is a female patient, 63-year-old,that presented with a pathologic fractureof the right subtrochanteric area of thefemur.The patient was simply standingwhen she sustained the fracture,and during the workup,a CT scan of the chestdemonstrated a large tumor that was consistentwith the primary tumor of the patient.It was decided to take the patient for fixationof this fracture with an intramedullary nail trochanteric entrymade of carbon fiberin addition to an open biopsy to typifyher metastatic adenocarcinoma.This procedure is goingto be performed in the lateral position with the assistanceof a bean bag and a flat Jackson table.All the bone prominences of the patient will beprotected, and the subaxiliaryrole will be used to protectand preventthe occurrence of neuropraxia.The left common peroneal nerve will be also offloadedwith the assistance of supportive forms.An initial approach to perform the biopsy will be performed.This will be a straight lateral approachto the proximal femur through a subvastus approach.Samples will be taken with a curette,and samples will be sent for frozen and permanent pathology.Once a diagnosisof a metastatic adenocarcinoma is confirmedhistopathologically,we will proceed with a second incisionin order to access the proximal femurand insert in a progressive mannerthe carbon femoral nail rod.The steps for the surgery are the sameof a traditional metallic rod.The starting point is identified in the APand lateral views with the assistance of fluoroscopy.Once that wire is advancedand excellent position is confirming those two views,an opening reamer is used to access the proximal femur.It is my preference for subtrochanteric fracturesto use the finger tool for the reduction.In most of these cases,I use a coaxial linear clamp for reduction.But because of the patient's poor bone quality,I will use either Schanz pinsor K-wires to control the proximal and distal piece.The use of bone hooks or other clamps sometimes is limitedbecause of the poor quality of the bone.Once we have the fracture reduced,we'll proceed to do sequential reamingafter advancing a ball-tip guidewire.This sequential reaming will beone and a half size above the diameter of the desired nail.Before the reaming, we'll measure the lengthof the nail being surethat we have the fracture out to length.The carbon fiber implant has a narrow light insidebecause of biomechanical purposes.This lumen doesn't allow thepassage of a ball-tip guidewire.Therefore, it's important to rememberthat one of the steps of this surgical techniqueis to exchange the ball-tip guidewirethat's been used for the reamingto prevent the loosening of the sequential reamers,but then change to a smooth wireto be able to insert the nailand remove the wire with no difficulty.In this surgical technique,we will see how this step is performedusing an exchange tube.Once the fracture is reducedand the carbon fiber rod is in place,we'll proceed to use the aiming armand through the same incision,we'll use the triple trocar to access the proximal femurand insert the guidewire for the femoral neck trajectoryfor the femoral neck screw.We'll use a triple reamerafter measuring the length of the screw.Ultimately, we'll advance the screw in the femoral neckafter confirming excellent position in the APand lateral views under fluoroscopyof the guidewire as well as of the screw.And then we will set up the screw with setting a screwthat is inserted proximally on the femoral nail.At the end, confirming a good AP and lateral of the hipand a good AP and lateral of the knee,we'll proceed to block the distal portion of the nailusing the perfect circle technique, which hasa modification in the carbon fiber rod.In this type of implant, instead of a circle,what it is visualized is four dots in the AP viewthat get aligned to become two dots on the lateral view.Placing the drill in between those two dotswill access the hole where the screws will go for blocking.Once the nail is blocked, we'll take shots with fluoroscopyto confirm excellent position of the components.We'll irrigate copiously the surgical field.My preference is to use peroxide solution in orderto mitigate the amount of tumoral cellsafter the open biopsy and the reaming.And we'll close by layers using interrupted number 1-0and 2-0 monofilament sutures in combinationwith monofilament sutures for the skinand acrylic dressing for the skin in combination with gauzeand Tegaderm dressing.After the surgery, the patient will be madeweightbearing as tolerated.The patient will be using a walker for comfort.The patient will be receiving DVT prophylaxisfor a period of a month,and the staging status will be completed.This patient is still has pending a CT of the abdomenand pelvis that has not been obtainedbecause of issues with pain control.We expect to take this postoperatively.In addition, the patient will receive preoperativeantibiotics for 24 hours,and we'll expect the patientto be ready to receive radiationto the femur postoperatively a week to 10 days from surgeryand start chemotherapy approximatelytwo weeks after surgery.
CHAPTER 2
A little bit more anterior.Have the skin -I've just come,anterior to it.Incision. Do you want me to take the whole thingor just a little bit for the biopsy?I will open thing - surgery,can put the,the clamp, et cetera.And hopefully we're at theright spot.And then we'll take the Weitlaner pretty fast.We'll start with Weities.Perfect.Can I have a Jeff, please? Yep.Too posterior.The anatomy gets all distorted.Do you have a Cobb, please?And a cerebellar.Can I have...Tensor fasciae latae or vastus lateralis?I think it's gotta be fasciae latae, right? Yeah. I think so.Do you have a cobra, please?This guy.So I basically,tensor fasciae latae, you put your finger behind,then you feel the subtroch area and then you feel thevastus lateralis.And this is the fat.Incarcerated piece that you were mentioning.Yeah.It just - a little piece went right through the lateralis.Do you have a Cobb please? Could I get a Cobb?Cobb is up, I believe.Yeah, I have it. Nevermind.Harder.Do you have the suction?Do you have the hips, please?This will see it better just like that.So it's the proximal fragment damaged.Do you have the rongeur and a curette, please?Oh yeah, that was on my mind.Those for specimen.Do you have a pickup just here?Perfect.Here, hold that one, one second.Suction.I see one little pieceof tumor I think.Yeah, you have two down there.Do you have the curette, please?I do.Do you like - the mushy thing?Yeah, so you can see like some, there's kind of some vasculature,something like this, but this stuff that looks like brains -it's little tumor.Because this isn't a medullary cavity.You can get it there. This stuff here.That guy.Is that some?That looks like,maybe something.Suction, again.Switch out, that is my tumor.Don't suck it out, let's get that.Okay, let's handle that for frozenand then we'll get some for permanent too, in another...Hm, not too bad.So all that stuffis tumor inside. Yeah.Do you have another cobra, please?Two if you can make it two.Or a harmonic I can take next,so you can come out with this one.Oh man.I think we can do it with a rongeur.That's the other part of the bone.Can come out with this one, hold that one.I'm just going to releasemore of the septum.Do you have the cup again, please?I'll take the suction.Can we get some peroxide irrigation, please?Just one second, it's at the bottom.Well it is a subtrochanteric fracture,so that's where it's supposed to be.Do you have - that's okay.Do you have...Let's see if this is flex...If it's here, so maybe make it here.
CHAPTER 3
Just wanna be like...Do you have another cerabellar, please?Or a gelpi, if you don't have a...Yeah. Yep.Can I have actually a deep knife, please?You need a knife?Yeah, like a deep one.A deep one, yeah.Yeah it just reacts with all the blood that's in the...That's cool to know.That's cool to know.Yeah, I'm sorry.Okay, that's our starting point there.Paula, can we get Schanz pins, please?This is just way too flexed.It's 90 degrees.It's more like 90.We can do some more irrigationwhile we wait for the Schanz pins.There is nothing to read so,we just have to like lineit up as straight.Can't wait.All the way posterior.That's why I went,that's why I made the incision a little bit posterior.And that's why I put my finger to get the hookand then you get like asubvastus.Because otherwise you just go through a muscleand it is just like,all this bleeding and a mess and gets in there.And so,is there any cuff on the septum, or?I don't think so.I kind of like,I think I left everything.What I have here is justtensor fasciae latae, and you can put your finger right there,look you can feel the septum there.That'll be great.Can we get them on power, please?
CHAPTER 4
Let me just move you a little bit.Can you come with the x-ray, please?Do you want it to be on this side,Dr. Lozano?No, you're good, you can do it there.Can bring this guy up.Lemme give you the Cobbie back.And can you swing?Yep, to an AP.Yes, please.Do you have the pin, please?X-ray there.Can I go more proximal, please?All the way up to the hip.So I can go a little more, even more.X-ray there.Some, on the...And this is flexed.X-ray there.X-ray.Do you have the handle, please?Can you go more north, please?Let's get this guy.Do you want to come up to find your starting point?Do you have another one of those pins?So I'm going to shoot posteriorly with this one.X-ray there.Looks pretty good.X-ray.Do you have another T-handle, please?Let me pass this guy back.X-ray there.You know, I just want to get it first,like a good AP of the proximal fragment.X-ray there.More internal rotation.Yeah.X-ray.That looks better, and,we want a little bit of valgus.X-ray.X-ray again.I think that's an acceptable AP.I like it.If anything,I think we're seeing a little bitof lesser, a little bit more than I would.So more external rotation?More internal rotation.But you're saying we're seeing a lot of...He was saying a lot of lesser.Yeah, because we're seeingtoo much lesser, looks very... Okay.X-ray.But with internal rotation, that will be more.X-ray.That x-ray looks betterbecause you can actually can see the -then internally rotate a little more.X-ray.Yeah. That's it.Okay.Get it George, so you have the startingwire, please.So I'm internally rotatingand abducting,so you can find easier the thing.
CHAPTER 5
Have to come more lateral.Yeah. With the wire.Yeah, let me just see where I am.So go more medially.Shot there.Okay.A little bit more medial.What's that, yeah.Shot there.Perfect. I like that.Okay, so you can advance it.You have the power, please?And then if anything,it looks like you're aiming to anterior.I will try to go more posterior for the lateral.Okay.I don't know what happened there.Shot there.Come up.You're either too posterior, or...That bone, is that soft?Yeah,oh my God. Okay.Okay.I don't like it though.Do you wanna come... Shot there.Shot there.Come more lateral.Because you're moving anterior to raise your hand,if you want to come lateral.I want to come a little medial.Shot there. That's what I meant.So you have to raise your hand, so you're in more medial.There we go. Right, I see.Shot there.Okay.Come to a lateral, please.Get the...Have to raise the machine.Split, please.You have to pull it in, then you have to try to connect the two.Yep.Then see over a little more,then pull back towards you a little bit.Tilt like 10 degrees that way.X-ray there.X-ray there,and you need to go more north.Do a little anterior.Have to come more posterior on the -have another 3-2? thank you.Okay, shot there.I like that.X-ray.Have to be more.X-ray there.Okay.Can you come to the AP, please?Then swing by.X-ray there.Can you go north, please.So it's a little bitexternally rotated again.So advance the posterior one more,then take the other one out.Okay, x-ray there.Little bit more.Shot.Good, okay, get the other one out.Opening reamer.
CHAPTER 6
So this is a...Okay, shot there.So this is the opening reamer, pushing more.Shot there.And shot.Go for it.Shot.Okay.Shot.All right, pushing the wire.Yeah, that's fine,but I think you open enough that...That it's good?Yeah, because we're going, hitting -the reason why is because I have my,my guy here.There you go.Okay, do you have the...?Let's get the finger tool first.
CHAPTER 7
You're not going-yeah you have to miss, yep.Yeah.Okay, now we have toget ready for the traction.X-ray there.X-ray.Find the thing, or?Yeah, I feel the hole. Okay. X-ray there.If anything, I have to like...X-ray there.X-ray,x-ray.Pathology.Okay, great.Yes, please.Shot there.Okay, he can hear you.Okay, so we received the right proximal femur for biopsy.It shows metastatic carcinoma.Great, thank you!Thank you. You're welcome.Are you in, or?Yeah, it feelslike it's in, but I don't like that.Shot there.Okay.The things are in.Try to pass the wire.If - I mean I think I have you pretty well reduced on this.X-ray there.Actually,x-ray.Turn it the other way, like 90 degrees.Shot there.Okay, now making it worse.X-ray there.I think it's like the piece is still, it's flexed.Okay, so you know you're out.X-ray.You can get the - just the wire.See if you can pass it through - to valgus.Shot there.Shot.Hole is right there.Let me just switch with you, one second.This is flexed again a lot.So let's...Can you give me some traction, please?X-ray there.X-ray there.That's way too much.Can you hold this guy like this?One there, somebody has to keep the traction.So you're externally rotateda lot again, can you internally rotate? Because it's very...Internally rotate.X-ray there.X-ray.You x-rayed my leg.Okay that's better. X-ray.Okay, can you give more traction, please?X-ray.Let's screw it a little bit, I have control of it.X-ray there.So you can make it unicortical,like just keep backing out this.Okay, x-ray.X-ray there.A little bit more.X-ray.X-ray.X-ray.X-ray.X-ray.More posterior. X-ray.X-ray.X-ray.Hold on one second.So come on this.X-ray.You wanna put abump under here? No.X-ray.X-ray there.So let me just have you hereand then I will... Yeah.You can advance it when...Have some irrigation?So you see, it's not doing anything.Do you have a cobb, please?Have the suction?Can you put the light on there?Let's put the bump under there, put it the other way.Yeah, turn it.You have to bring thisto the front a little bit.So try to advance more the thing,because you're the one that is controlling the varus/valgus,so you have to drop your hand a little bitso it comes out of the...Shot there. Okay.Okay.Shot there.Then it - keep advancing.Try...Shot there.Shot there.Great forearm.Why don't you try to -can you advance more or no?You can feel that you're, let me just...I can.Shot there. Give me one second.We're actually in.Do you have some irrigation, please?Can you see me?Do you have a Schnidt, please?A Schnidt? Yep.Can you come out with the C-arm, please?Watch out that...Completely out?Yeah, completely out.Have to raise the machine.So we're coming anterior.Going anterior to it.The distal.Can you come with the x-ray, please?Hopefully you're hitting this.Mhm.I think you are. Yeah.Pull back. It's fine.Pull back towards you, let's try that.Can you come more distal, please?You're good, can you come to AP, please?Pull some traction.X-ray there.Okay.So... Can you pull it outa little bit more?Because I'm just stuck. I'm going through it,just unicortical.It's just stuck.X-ray.X-ray there.That's it. That's it.
CHAPTER 8
Okay so,do you have the ball-tip guidewire, please?X-ray there.Okay.X-ray there.It's in.Maybe I'm blocking you.X-ray.Oh it's... Okay.So you have to do - so turn it.Turn this thing.Yeah, there we go. X-ray there.Okay, come down to the knee, please.X-ray there.Beautiful, can you come andtake a lateral of the knee, please?Can we bring the table up a little bit, please?X-ray there.That's fine.Okay, can you go to an AP of the hip?X-ray there? Yep.X-ray there.X-ray.Do you have one of the wireslike that we use for the starting point?Can you load it to put it again with power?I think lengthwise we're doing good.Well you don't take the finger tool out then.X-ray there.Okay, x-ray there.
CHAPTER 9
Okay, do you have the ruler thing?Do you have that guy?X-ray there.Pull back a little bit.Shot there.Let's see if I can really go very anterior.X-ray there.X-ray.This guy. Okay,so it's this line right here, right?So... Yeah.It's over a 360, so...So you can get a 360. Pretty long.So 360.360.By 11, bend this.
CHAPTER 10
X-ray there.I like it there.In terms of...Rotation. Rotation.And then it makes sense below.And then,we just want it a little bit like thisso we're not in valgus. X-ray.And then these things,can you give me some traction here.Without my glove, thank you.For me, it's...X-ray there.That looks worse.X-ray.Well, let's do the reaming and then we can,so you have the 8-5 reamer, please?X-ray there.That's better.And then I have to pull this out a little bit.X-ray.That's good, okay.Go for it.Shot there.Could I use the lap?Can you come a little distal with theC-arm?X-ray.That's good.Okay.Can we get a 9-5, please?9-5, absolutely.That's why I was transferring in.I was really worriedher bone was gonna fall apart. 9-5.I'm still worried about it.Don't jinx me.Don't worry.Good, so far so good though.Good for... She was laughingat my jokes.10-5 next, please.10-5, yep.10-5,there you go.10-5.You want to help Paula with the...You want 11?11-5?11-5, please. Yeah,and then we're gonna get,this is gonna bean 11 probably.What size is this one?11 and a half?11 and a half.I think it's gonna be,probably an 11 nail.Yeah, that's what we have.X-ray there.Good.Are you good with that,or do you want another one?We'll get a 12 and then12 and a half please. Okay.I have to push more that thing in there.There we go.So you get the next, to get that stuff ready.That's for the exchange tube and the smooth wire.So the nail is 11, we'll do 12 and a half.The inner diameter of the nail,if you put it over a ball-tip guidewire,the ball-tip doesn't fit through the nail.So you have to use an exchange tubeto make it to put a smooth wire.The ball-tip thing is more so the flexible reamerbut there are some reamers thatif you use the similar cannulated ones,those come incorporated,you could do them over the smooth wire.Right, you don't need... You don't have touse the ball-tip.Okay.
CHAPTER 11
So this is. So that goes,just slide it, yep.All the way in.You just have to be past there?Yep, push in, over the wire.Just like that.Could take that one out.Put this - move.You need to take some.Am I hitting, I think I might be.Okay, x-ray there.Yeah, it should be fine.Okay.Just take that one out. This seems longerthan this.Can you come down to the knee, please?Okay, x-ray there.We love it.
CHAPTER 12
Okay, get your nail.Can you keep some of the traction, please?This is not doing anything.Did you have the irrigation, please?Yes. Just hold onone second, so I can keep it ready as well.Can we have this to the pathology?Okay, advance it.Not all the way in but just - x-ray there.So you're past. I'm right the fracture site.Past the fracture site.I'm past?Yep, stay at the -so back it out a little bit.Give me some traction.Okay.X-ray there.Okay. Okay,now let's see, advance it more.X-ray.Okay, that looks good.That internal rotation looks good, keep going.So you have to come a little bit more like thisso it advances more.And then you kind of start to turn.X-ray there.I like it.Keep going.Okay.X-ray there.Good, keep going.Do you have the wire driver, please?Yep.Wire back.Let's see, x-ray there.Good, keep going.Does the rotationlook okay proximally?It looks a little external, doesn't it?Compared to the... You can get...X-ray.That's it. That's better.Looks fine to me.Yeah,well we'll advance it also,we can secure the proximal fragmentand then we can work around with the distal one.Okay. Shot there.Good.I think that's it.I think that,couple of taps but that's it, okay.Do you have the trocar, please?I just wanna make surewe're good by the knee.One second.Hold on one second, x-ray there.Okay, take the traction off, yep.X-ray there.That's reduced.So can you tap it a little bit more?Just a couple more taps.Because what I will do is likeI will lift it up like this.Hold on one second.Okay,x-ray.Very tiny.Tiny bit more.Shot. X-ray.That's it.I think that's -can we come down to the knee, please?So we need to get a little bitmore of external rotation - x-ray.X-ray.Okay, can you go up to the hipagain?Can you hold that in traction, in that position?X-ray there.And come more distal, please.That's pretty good.Do you have the trocar, please?
CHAPTER 13
So it's on the 1-30,that's the one where it comes.Oh, nice.Okay.Yeah. Yep.So you can take this guy out.Want to come on this side, or?X-ray there.Do you have the...I can hold... The driver.I feel a tractionand Brandon can do it.This is the onethat goes in here. That's the long one, yeah.Oh but we can -can we make sure on this one.X-ray.Ooh. Ooh.Ooh.X-ray.It's locked in the... It's okay.X-ray.Okay, can you come to a lateral, please?Do a little anteverted.It's pretty good I think.If anything we have to go a little bit posterior.You have the wire driver?Just a little bit.Yeah it's not bad.On the -as premium mode.X-ray there.X-ray.Too much.X-ray.That's pretty -that's pretty good.X-ray.Kind of like in the center.Huh?I don't think it'sthe best lateral of the neck.Can you tilt 10 degrees that way?I want to start more posterior.X-ray there.X-ray.X-ray there.X-ray.X-ray.X-ray.X-ray.Problem is like if we ream on this one,I'm going to get the the anterior cortex.X-ray.X-ray.Is that the same hole?X-ray.X-ray.X-ray.X-ray.And that's the...Can you see back towards you a little bit?Actually stay there, yep.X-ray there.I think that works.I still have anterior neck there.Yeah. That's fine.Can we come back to the AP, please?X-ray there.You can kind ofmake new one.Okay.
CHAPTER 14
Do you have the ruler please, for the...It's a pretty damn good reduction.Yeah, I'll say so.It got better.That's good traction.So,we'll do 85, please.Actually,actually we are going a little in...I'm pretty sure. Hold on one second.X-ray there.It's wearing the -80 that's,yeah, 85 is fine.85.
CHAPTER 15
All right, so I'm toldthat once this is set, it's not supposed to move?Yeah. And I can't get itto not move, so I dunno if you can tighten that tighter.It goes the opposite way of what you'd think.Okay, that's good.That did it,85 in there? Yep.So so you measured...You measured 85.You measured exactly 85. 85, and I'mgoing to an 85.Might have to turn it back to drill.Yeah, I have it on drill.Yep.X-ray there.X-ray.Why is it so short?Doesn't make any sense.Can we take the measuring tool back?I feel like the -and then the... Yeah.It's measuring... That's the 90.Lin, do we have the - this wire,the long one is the appropriate for measuring,this is just doesn't,I just did 85 on this and it looks...Yeah, it looks great.No, look at - that's the,we measured 85off of that wire that's in there.And that's how far it went.Let me see, x-ray there.X-ray.Hmm.I'll probably have to change it.Are you supposed to... Do we have one that isfemoral neck?Just looks...Really short. Like,longer than the previous, like...Oh okay, that'smaybe what it was. That's why.Okay, so it's actually...It's little over 90.95, so let's do 90.Can you change it to 90?Let's see.It still doesn't seemlike it's gonna be enough.But it's not going to be enough.Why you don't do 95?Yeah, so I'm stillmoving this even though it's supposedly locked. Okay, x-ray there.X-ray.Even is measuring short.You did 95, right?Or 90?But it's usuallybetween 90 and 100.X-ray there.X-ray.That's great. That sounds good.So it is going to be105.105?Oh it's measuring from the top of the thing.The second trocar.If it measures from this. No, but that'snot how it goes.Yeah. It goes like this.X-ray there.And that's measuring 100.X-ray there.But now it's off. So it still is off.Okay, we'll try the 105.So as bad as the bone is,it's always,don't get any surprises of...X-ray.It's a really good reduction, we're looking.Well I think it's not moving or,you think it's moving?We're internally rotated here...Oh yeah, no I'm just sayingthat makes sense, we're internally rotated.This looksinternally rotated. Yeah.We're happy. We're happy.X-ray.Measuring 90.Unless you're doinga rotation plasty, then that's all intentional.X-ray.Oh. Oh.So this is measuring 100.X-ray.90.So it was really,hold on one second.X-ray.That's measuring...85, right?85, that's the first one that I gave you.We have it open on the table.Okay. So do you wantme to load it?Yeah, load that one in instead.We did something wrong,cannot know what.X-ray there.That like, just come like this.X-ray there.That's a good view of the...So that is the 85.85, okay.X-ray there, please.X-ray.X-ray.X-ray there.It looks short because...No, it doesn't look short.It's like... No. because the interface,no but the interface of the screw.Yeah.With the other one,like you see it should be outside the,inside the bone with the screwdriver.You see how the screw is going all the...Oh I see, yeah,I see what you're saying.Yeah.Yeah, you're all the way in the bone.What is the other one that we have?A 105.Can I get that one, please?This is good bread and butter,pathologic trauma. Yeah becausethat's subtroch.X-ray. That's the key for this case.Yeah, the Schanz pins. Then the finger tool. Schanz pins and the finger tool.Where is the dot?The first one was 85.It's going to be 95.It is a 95.Okay, I don't know what it waswith the measuring thing but,do you have a 95?The third is the charm, is the expression?Yep.Is there anythinglike that in Spanish?Hm?That's like thethird time's the charm?No, it doesn't translate.The only thing that translates in Spanishis, "This sucks."X-ray there.Alright, we're taking bets.Oh this has to be it.X-ray.It's going to look beautiful.X-ray.Like that?Ooh. That's it.That's as far asit can possibly go. That's perfect, yep.Otherwise…
CHAPTER 16
Do you have the settingscrewdriver, please?So it's like your screwdriverwith this tiny little screw that is coming.And it's just thisone hole right here? Yep.Okay.All the way in.That's a tiny little screw, yeah.There is no helical blade.No squeak or anything, right?Nope, X-ray there.Just super tight.As hard as you can.See.That's it.Okay.Your eye balls were coming out, so I think we're good.
CHAPTER 17
Let's see. X-ray there.That's not a good AP.X-ray.That's a better... Take it again.X-ray. That looks like a good AP, agree?You like that better? I like it.Okay so hold it there,make sure that we didn't move.Good, can you come down to the knee?X-ray.That's a good AP of the knee.I like it, okay.
CHAPTER 18
Can you come to thelateral of the knee, please?And put the machine as high as you canand go proximal, x-ray there.Can you open the C, please?X-ray there.X-ray.X-ray.X-ray.So lock it for the C and then open the tilt a little bit.X-ray again.Can you open the C again and lock the tilt?Can you lock it there?Do you have the 10 blade, please?
X-ray.X-ray.Small posterior.X-ray.Schnidt, please.Shooting in betweenthose holes and this?Yes.Have the drill, please?
X-ray.Going anterior,x-ray.X-ray.It looks pretty good.So now this is the...I'm going from your side.I'm looking at this but in this side, how am I looking?This side is fine, yeah it is,yeah. Okay.You have to tell me because I can't look at you.Okay.How am I lookingfrom your other. Still all right there.Okay.It's through.X-ray there.Perfect.10 blade again, please.X-ray.X-ray.Can I have the Schnidt?This is the easy part of this case.X-Ray.X-ray.X-ray.A little posterior.X-ray.That looks pretty good.Parallel to that,where I'm looking.So I'm going to use the other pin to guide myself.I'm looking good there?Yeah, that looks really good.Can you come to the AP of the knee, please?Can we bring the table up. please?Yes.How is she doing, Kelly?You can come now,the nail is blocked because of the drills.Depth gauge.
Okay, do you have a 40, please?40.
40.I'll take it, okay.X-ray there.Can I pass offthose two lag screws?Yeah, for sure.Do we have necklaces for...I have to bring themdownstairs and have them set back up first, and then yes.Since I'm giving all these fluids,can we get them also like a nail,just so they have the two things.Feels proud.There we go.X-ray.Okay.Have the power again, please?Yeah.
The nail looks -well, we got it a little shorter, right?Just... Oh I'm sorry,I thought you were... No.You think the nail looks short, or?Well, it's shorter than what we did.I mean it's finishing maybe like half.I'm just being as premium mode.X-ray.Kind of like five, four millimeters of perfection.I think that's a very good guesstimate.X-ray there.This one is measuring 42.Like 40 as well.Oh wow.Well, I guess...I guess we don't... We have the..?If you're in the posterior part.Yeah, I guess. But it's going to look short.Do you have the 42.5?We'll just do it a little bit more proud.
X-ray.X-ray.Okay.X-ray.Great bite, okay.
CHAPTER 19
So now let's see.X-ray there.X-ray again.Save that, that's a good AP of the knee.Can you go up to the hip?X-Ray.Take the arm so we can actually,I mean it's going to be like a fivedegrees of external rotationbut she's not going to be internally rotated.It was an 85 screw.X-ray there.Okay, save that.That looks great.Okay, can you come overand get a lateral of the hip?Yep, and then if you could give us the tilt the other way.X-ray there.A little bit... Save that.It's like a tiny bit flexed, like...Not like it was.Yeah.Okay, save that.Let's do the AP first.I haven't moved.X-ray.Okay, save that.Now let me - x-ray there.X-ray again.Sorry.X-ray.Too much.X-ray.X-ray.Okay, save those.Then come to an AP of the knee.Save that.X-ray again.Save that.Okay, can you go up just to the hipout of curiosity to see how...Yeah, because that'slike a perfect AP. That's a perfect AP.Yeah.There.This - so she's externally rotated there.That's a perfect fit. Has a little flex.So,we'll see what her,if anything, she'll be a little bit moreinternally rotated than the other leg but,can come out and...Paula, can we get a pulse lavage, please?
CHAPTER 20
Yep, wash that out completely.To be sure that nothing else is havingbleeding.Yeah.No.Let's do,2-0 and a Monocryl.I can try to put it here.Oh yeah.Well she wants to haveall her care in Newton-Wellesley.So I guess what we'll get is likea CT of the abdomen and pelvis,which she doesn't have, she just has the chest.That's correct, right?She just has the chest.She just has the chest.So I'll do abdomen and pelvis.Could I have a 2-0?
CHAPTER 21
There's a clean one. Thank you.We'll get youanother one in a minute.So kind.Do you have another one?Have a Yankauer and a Schnidt, please?And then could I grab aWeitlaner and a one?Do you have a number one PDS, please?I'm gonna close this, Brandon.See that pock hole that the fracture made?Three Bovie tips.And the scratch to go with it.Have another,another number one, yep, please.And I'll take a Richardson too.A what?A Richardson or a lady finger.So, I'm going to...I think it's interestingbecause he has an anterior predominant lesion,but obviously... Yes.So it's a little bit more fussy with femoral implants.Then I'll take an 0.A sponge and suction.Do you want a wrap?I think we're okay,Dr. Lozano had one, sorry.Give you this.Have a 0 for Brandon, please.Just a subtroch.Hold that. The finger tool.That's the key.And so that works when you have a knot inside,so you have to leave tails for bothand then you just pull them when you put Dermabond.Want to come here so you can actually see and,and you can get a wet and dry and...No we'll do a deep layer of zeros there too.I was going with 2-0Do you want another?Yeah, let's do the 2 and see if it works.
CHAPTER 22
As you notice in the video,the patient was positioned in the lateral decubitus.This surgery can be performed also in a fracture tablein the supine decubitius,but it's my preference to attend the lateral position,given that there is more freedom to flex the legand match the reduction betweenthe distal fragment and the proximal fragment.In this case,you saw how the proximal fragmentwas flexed almost 90 degrees with incarcerationof the proximal fragment in the anterior fasciaof the musculature of the thigh.You notice how I use Schanz pinsto manipulate the pieces andcorrect the deformity of the proximal piece,which is characteristically in external rotationand abduction and flexion of the proximal fragment.The distal fragment usually isin adduction and with shortening.You could observe as well how we use thefinger tool to reduce the fracture afterdoing the standard steps to access the proximal femurin order to advance the ball-tip guidewire.You saw how we used the finger toolto advance the ball-tip guidewireto an excellent position in the APand lateral views with x-rays.You could also see how we measured the length of the nailwith the leg in traction to avoid discrepancy.The rotation and reduction was assessed with the helpof fluoroscopy obtaining the most anatomic AP viewof the hip as well as of the knee.This is very important because in these typeof pathologic fractures,there is no fracture line that may facilitatethe width and anatomic reduction of the fracture.You also observe how we usethe perfect circular dot techniqueto insert the two blocking screws.In this case, you saw how we position the C-armto match the position of the legas we didn't want to mobilize the legto change the obtained reduction.You also saw how I used two drillsand left one in place to help me as a guideto insert the trajectory for the second screw.The remaining of the steps, as you could see,are pretty standard to one,an intramedullary nail fixationof the subtrochanteric area is.In this technique, we use the trochanteric entry nail,but you can also use a piriformis nail.It is my preference to use a carbon fiber nailbecause of its radiolucencyand the planiation of postoperative radiationafter surgery, as well as theevaluation of subsequent CT scansand MRIs that are obtained for oncologic purposes.In addition, the radiolucency allowsto evaluate and visualize intraoperative fractures.The modulus of elasticityis also closer to the one of bone.The mechanical properties and bending forcesare also superior when comparedto the metallic implants of this nature.I hope you find this surgical technique video usefuland the information contained on it valuable.Thank you for reviewing it.