Sign Up
  • Title
  • Animation
  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Incision and Entry into the Abdomen Along the Midline
  • 3. Dissection Laterally to Remove Bowel from Defects from Known to Unknown
  • 4. Running the Bowel
  • 5. Measuring the Defect and Protecting the Bowel
  • 6. Right Posterior Rectus Sheath Incision and Development of Posterior Rectus Space
  • 7. Transversus Abdominis Release (TAR) on the Right
  • 8. Closure of Lateral Defects on the Right
  • 9. Left Posterior Rectus Sheath Incision and Development of Posterior Rectus Space
  • 10. TAR on the Left
  • 11. Further Cephalad Dissection Around Diaphragm
  • 12. Closure of any Remaining Defects
  • 13. Posterior Rectus Sheath Closure
  • 14. Mesh Placement
  • 15. Drain Placement
  • 16. Skin Excision
  • 17. Anterior Rectus Sheath Closure
  • 18. Closure
  • 19. Post-op Remarks
cover-image
jkl keys enabled

Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction with Transversus Abdominis Release (TAR)

Michael J. Rosen, MD, FACS
Cleveland Clinic

Main Text

This video demonstrates a case involving an open complex abdominal wall reconstruction with transversus abdominis release. The case involves an obese patient with a multiply recurrent incarcerated incisional hernia. The CT scan shows a complex defect involving the midline, right linea semilunaris, and inter-rectus hernia. The use of a retromuscular procedure with a posterior component separation will be highlighted and its advantages of allowing wide mesh overlap without creation of subcutaneous tissue flaps to repair defects with these challenging characteristics.

Complex abdominal wall reconstruction; incisional hernia; TAR.

This video shows the repair of a large complex incisional hernia after multiple prior failed repairs and lateral and midline defects.

51-year-old female with BMI of 43 Kg/m2. She has had four prior hernia operations including laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with mesh and an attempted robotic repair that was complicated by a missed enterotomy, end colostomy, open abdomen, and healed by secondary intention. She underwent takedown of her stoma, small bowel resection with primary anastomosis, and primary ventral hernia repair 10 months prior to this procedure. She currently has an intact functioning GI tract with a large complex incisional hernia. The hernia involves her right linea semilunaris, right rectus muscle, and her midline incision.

Obese patient with large defects both in the midline and lateral abdomen. She has a large midline scar that requires revision.

The CT scan will be reviewed in the video. It highlights the anatomic location of the defects and the inherent challenges of repairing these defects with retromuscular surgery.

There are not many options to repair these types of large defects. One consideration is the need for preoperative optimization. This patient is morbidly obese with diabetes. While there is not an ideal cutoff for preoperative weight loss, it should be considered in all patients. In this specific case, this patient was enrolled in a randomized controlled trial evaluating the benefits of preoperative weight management versus upfront surgery for patients with BMI between 40 to 55 kg/m2. She was randomized to upfront surgery and did not lose any weight prior to surgery. Her obesity does provide several challenges in gaining exposure, retraction, dealing with the soft tissue, and hernia sac.

Given the large defect, loss of domain, and wide scar, in my opinion, there are no minimally-invasive options. Given her obesity, an anterior component separation is not ideal, as the large skin flaps will significantly increase wound morbidity. While an open IPOM (Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh) repair is something to consider, it still requires skin flaps and the lateral defects will make that more challenging. Our approach involves a posterior component separation with synthetic mesh to provide wide coverage without raising skin flaps.

This approach will allow for repair of the hernia and improving of the patient’s quality of life. In addition, it will reduce the risks of requiring emergency surgery while this obese patient waits for preoperative optimization.

The most important aspect to consider in this type of case is the experience of the surgeon performing the operation. As will be demonstrated in this case, the challenges of reoperative abdomens, adhesions, altered abdominal wall anatomy can all make this case extremely complex.

The operation begins by making a generous midline incision and excising the prior scar.  Entering the reoperative abdomen can be challenging and it is important to have a systematic approach. We do this by opening the fascia in the upper abdomen and getting into the preperitoneal space without making any effort to enter the peritoneal cavity. Then we placed two Kocher clamps and with upward retraction of the Kocher clamps and downward retraction with a DeBakey forceps, we were able to identify the line of the abdominal wall that we can continue to dissect. We carefully dissected the line, and it is important to point out that we are not dissecting the bowel, we are simply dissecting that line. We stay within the midline and do not drift out laterally as that can result in worse exposure and potential enterotomies. We sequentially go down the abdominal wall until we have opened the full midline. Then we dissect each lateral abdominal wall with four Kocher clamps pulling up and getting a wide exposure trying to work around laterally to the area of concern. In this case, we reduce the right side and both the lateral defects manually and with blunt dissection are also able to identify the line of the hernia sac to reduce everything out. It is optional whether or not to lyse all intraloop adhesions and is certainly something that I do prefer to do because of the risk of postoperative obstructions and perhaps not lysing a key adhesion. After the adhesiolysis is completed and any intra-abdominal procedures were performed, we placed a blue towel that is wet over the viscera to protect it during abdominal wall reconstruction.

The abdominal wall reconstruction was begun on the right side initially by taking down the posterior rectus sheath identifying the muscle belly. It is important that you identify muscle because if you see fat you are anterior to the linea alba and if you only see the white sheen to the posterior sheath, you are within the preperitoneal space. Once we identify the muscle, we extend superiorly and inferiorly and then encircle both the defect in the right rectus muscle and in the right linea semilunaris. One of the keys to dissection and a retromuscular operation is to encircle the more difficult part of the operation. As you will see, I dissect superiorly and inferiorly to get around the area of concern and eventually take those down and close up the resultant defects in the peritoneum to protect the viscera from the mesh. We continue this dissection in the lateral abdominal wall to identify the psoas and divide the round ligament going the space of Retzius and down to the central tendon the diaphragm under the costal margin. Similar dissection was performed on the left side to create a nice wide pocket to allow a tension-free closure of the posterior sheath as well as adequate mesh overlap in all directions. Once we closed the posterior sheath completely securing the mesh from interacting with the bowel, I closed the lateral fascial defects from inside with #1 PDS sutures. It is optional whether or not to put a drain in those areas but is certainly something that should be considered if the hernia sac is too large. I then placed an adequately sized piece of mesh which in this operation was a 30x30-cm piece of heavyweight polypropylene mesh. Based on prior randomized control trials, we no longer put transfascial sutures as long as adequate overlap is obtained. Two drains were placed in the mesh, and the midline was closed with #1 PDS figure-of-eight sutures. Often in obese patients we will place a drain in the subcutaneous pocket. And then the skin is closed in layers. The patient made an uneventful recovery and was discharged home on postoperative day 4 with all drains removed and was seen in 30-day follow-up and is back to full activity with no wound complications and feeling great.

This operation can be performed with minimal equipment and a fairly inexpensive uncoated polypropylene mesh.

ACHQC Salary support.

The patient referred to in this video article has given their informed consent to be filmed and is aware that information and images will be published online.

Citations

  1. Krpata DM, Petro CC, Prabhu AS, et al. Effect of hernia mesh weights on postoperative patient-related and clinical outcomes after open ventral hernia repair: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2021 Dec 1;156(12):1085-1092. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2021.4309.
  2. Krpata DM, Blatnik JA, Novitsky YW, Rosen MJ.  Posterior and open anterior components separations: a comparative analysis. Am J Surg. 2012 Mar;203(3):318-22; discussion 322. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.10.009.
  3. Zolin SJ, Krpata DM, Petro CC, et al. Long-term clinical and patient-reported outcomes after transversus abdominis release with permanent synthetic mesh: a single center analysis of 1203 patients. Ann Surg. 2023 Apr 1;277(4):e900-e906. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000005443.
  4. Miller BT, Ellis RC, Petro CC, et al. Quantitative tension on the abdominal wall in posterior components separation with transversus abdominis release. JAMA Surg. 2023 Dec 1;158(12):1321-1326. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2023.4847.
  5. Ellis RC, Petro CC, Krpata DM. Transfascial fixation vs no fixation for open retromuscular ventral hernia repairs: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2023 Aug 1;158(8):789-795. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2023.1786. Erratum in: JAMA Surg. 2023 Aug 1;158(8):892. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2023.3576.

Cite this article

Rosen MJ. Complex abdominal wall reconstruction with transversus abdominis release (TAR). J Med Insight. 2025;2025(469). doi:10.24296/jomi/469.